The UK Government's Office of Communications undertook a survey in March 2004
on the quality of the Directory Enquiry (DQ) 118 service which replaced the old
192 services
Figure 4a: Average time (seconds) from end of dialling number and being
answered, to obtaining information (chargeable time) compared with overall
accuracy and cost
Base: All requests, 5880 requests, March 2004 (Published June 2004)
Ofcom & ICSTIS findings on the development of 118 directory enquiries
market
Ofcom and ICSTIS, the regulatory body for premium-rate telephone
services, have today published the findings of new research into the
liberalised directory enquiries market.
The research examines the accuracy and cost of 118 services and
assesses public awareness and attitudes less than a year after the
full introduction of competition to the market.
The five key findings are:
- Some of the consumer benefits foreseen at the point of
liberalisation are beginning to emerge.
- The new market continues to mature and stabilise. The top 30
providers (accounting for at least 95% of the market by volume)
are delivering consistently reliable information; 87% of numbers
supplied to researchers in response to a realistic profile of
enquiries were accurate. By comparison, using a slightly
different methodology, an accuracy rate of 62% was measured in a
survey conducted in autumn 2003.
- Competition is beginning to drive down price; half the
providers surveyed now charge less than 40p to provide a single
number, below the minimum charge for BT's old 192 service.
- There are signs of a reasonable level of consumer
understanding of the services on offer. Public awareness of the
introduction of 118 services remains high and a majority of
consumers can spontaneously identify at least one directory
enquiries number. A third of consumers have selected a main
provider to meet their needs; two-thirds who have done so are
satisfied with that provider.
- The evidence indicates that the evolution of the UK market
is likely to be similar to that in other countries where
directory enquiries services have been liberalised successfully.
On the basis of the evidence, Ofcom has made three conclusions:
- Immediate regulatory intervention by Ofcom in this important
but young market would be premature and disproportionate.
- However, there is also evidence that many consumers remain
unsure about some aspects of the new market. Although it is
likely that public understanding will continue to grow as the
market matures, Ofcom will continue to monitor development
closely. This will include a further benchmarking study in late
2004.
- The findings indicate important learnings for Ofcom about
the best approach to providing neutral and timely information
for citizen-consumers where the nature of competition means that
the market alone is unlikely to provide such information. Those
learnings will be reflected in any such activity in future.
Key Research Outcomes
- 87% of all numbers requested in response to a realistic
profile of enquiries were given correctly.
- There was a narrow spread of accuracy between providers; the
highest average score was 96% and the lowest 80%.
- 99% of all calls were answered first time.
- Calls were answered by an advisor within an average of 8
seconds; typical call duration was under 1 minute.
- Half the services tested charged less than 40p. The cheapest
charged 27p for providing a single number. Half were more
expensive, charging up to 65p for a single number.
- There is no direct correlation between a provider's accuracy
and its cost. Some of the most accurate services were also the
cheapest.
- 85% of UK adults are aware of the replacement of 192 with a
range of 118 providers.
- 7 out of 10 UK adults who are aware of the changes are also
able spontaneously to state at least one directory enquiries
provider.
- 57% of UK adults currently use 118 services.
- 6 out of 10 UK adults aware of the changes to directory
services were also aware that pricing structures vary between
providers.
- Although the research data demonstrates that half of the
largest providers charge less than 40p for providing a single
number, 47% of UK adults still believe that all new 118 services
are more expensive than the cost of dialling 192.
- 3 out of 10 UK adults have selected a 118 provider to suit
their needs. Of those, 64% say they are satisfied with that
provider.
- 41% are aware of at least one additional enhanced service
(such as classified business searches) introduced by many 118
providers. 36% claim they are likely to use one.
The research assessing quality, accuracy and cost was
commissioned from MORI.Researchers made mystery shopping calls to the top
30 directory enquiries providers and made a total of 5,880 requests for
numbers. The calls were based on a new real-world weighted model, mixing
residential and business requests at a range of levels of difficulty to
reflect the actual profile of number requests to 118 providers.
Benchmark costs were derived from the average fee for providing a single
telephone number. To ensure consistency across all providers, the cost of
innovative new services introduced since the replacement of 192, such as
call completion and find-my-nearest, were not included.
Ofcom and ICSTIS also commissioned research from NOP on residential
consumer attitudes to the new services. Researchers polled 1,075 adults from
varying backgrounds across the UK to assess their understanding and use of
118 services.
Since full market liberalisation in August 2003, most network operators
have provided a free recorded announcement on the old 192 and 153 directory
enquiry numbers to ensure consumers who misdialled were alerted to the new
118 number range. Given the very high level of consumer awareness
demonstrated in the Ofcom and ICSTIS research (also supported by data on
patterns of dialling behaviour), Ofcom will allow operators to cease
offering this recorded announcement from 20 June 2004.
Ofcom is the independent regulator and competition authority for the UK
communications industries, with responsibilities across television, radio,
telecommunications and wireless communications services.
For further details please visit
www.ofcom.org.uk.